Loading...

Red Bull Energy Drinks False Representations Class Action

File500-06-000780-169
Date2016-02-18
Case nameRed Bull Energy Drinks False Representations Class Action

Alleged violations

Plaintiff alleges that Red Bull violated section 228 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act, by failing to inform consumers of the inherent dangers concerning the ingestion of its Caffeinated Energy Drinks. Plaintiff further alleges that Red Bull violated section 219 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act by making false claims concerning the functionality of its products on its websites and labelling, notably by claiming that Red Bull improves alertness or increases concentration (in French: améliorer la concentration et à accroitre la vigilance). Red Bull’s claims were falsely presented to the public as “scientific”, in violation of paragraph b of section 239 of Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act.

Class Authorized

All legal and natural persons (excluding minors, defined as natural persons under 18 years of age as of July 23, 2019) who were residents of Canada (including without limitation any of its provinces and territories) during the Class Period and who purchased and/or used or consumed one or more Red Bull CEDs in Canada during the Class Period, excluding Released Parties.

Compensation under the settlement

As detailed at its section D. (e), the Settlement Agreement provides that each class member who submits a valid claim will receive a maximum amount of $10.00 each. Class members had until 5:00 PM Eastern on October 14, 2019 to provide their email address to the claims administrator to receive a notice once the claims registration process opens at: https://energydrinksettlement.ca/.

Additionally, Red Bull has agreed to modify and update the French and English versions of its Canadian webpage to include a hyperlink to Health Canada’s warning concerning the potential health risks associated with consuming CEDs with alcohol.

Status

On February 11, 2020, the Superior Court of Quebec approved the Red Bull Settlement. All Class Members who provided their email address on the settlement website will be receiving an email from the Claims Administrator to complete the claims form. If you have any questions concerning the claim form please email the Claims Administrator: [email protected].

Court Documents

Download official documents

Closing Judgment
August 04, 2021
Judgment on Application to Approve a Settlement Agreement
February 11, 2020
Judgment on Consolidated Application for Authorization
July 23, 2019
Pre-approval Settlement Notice
Short Form
Pre-approval Settlement Notice
Long Form
Settlement Agreement
July 18, 2019

Find Similar Cases

Cottonelle and Cottonelle GentlePlus Flushable Wipes
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Cottonelle and Cottonelle GentlePlus Flushable Wipes

Affected lots of disposable wet wipes have been recalled by Kimberly-Clark and may ha...

Patterson v. Vivid Seats LLC
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Patterson v. Vivid Seats LLC

All persons in Quebec, who purchased before March 11, 2020 one or more tickets from V...

Crête v. Lenovo (Canada) Inc.
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Crête v. Lenovo (Canada) Inc.

If you attempted to purchase a laptop on lenovo.com between May 22 and 24, 2014, and...

Rogers Wireless Outage Class Action (April 19, 2021 Service Interruption)
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Rogers Wireless Outage Class Action (April 19, 2021 Service Interruption)

This class action (File No. 500-06-001144-217) was filed in the Superior Court of Qué...

Tesla Connectivity Service Fees: Allegations of illegality and/or unilateral termination
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Tesla Connectivity Service Fees: Allegations of illegality and/or unilateral termination

Subclass 1: All natural and legal persons who ordered or purchased in Québec, between...

Corbeil & Pilon v. Bell Canada
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Corbeil & Pilon v. Bell Canada

All natural and legal persons with less than fifty (50) employees, domiciled or havin...

Cottonelle and Cottonelle GentlePlus Flushable Wipes
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Cottonelle and Cottonelle GentlePlus Flushable Wipes

Affected lots of disposable wet wipes have been recalled by Kimberly-Clark and may ha...

Patterson v. Vivid Seats LLC
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Patterson v. Vivid Seats LLC

All persons in Quebec, who purchased before March 11, 2020 one or more tickets from V...

Crête v. Lenovo (Canada) Inc.
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Crête v. Lenovo (Canada) Inc.

If you attempted to purchase a laptop on lenovo.com between May 22 and 24, 2014, and...

Rogers Wireless Outage Class Action (April 19, 2021 Service Interruption)
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Rogers Wireless Outage Class Action (April 19, 2021 Service Interruption)

This class action (File No. 500-06-001144-217) was filed in the Superior Court of Qué...

Tesla Connectivity Service Fees: Allegations of illegality and/or unilateral termination
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Tesla Connectivity Service Fees: Allegations of illegality and/or unilateral termination

Subclass 1: All natural and legal persons who ordered or purchased in Québec, between...

Corbeil & Pilon v. Bell Canada
Class ActionConsumer Protection

Corbeil & Pilon v. Bell Canada

All natural and legal persons with less than fifty (50) employees, domiciled or havin...

Looking For Another Case?

Browse other active class actions or get in touch to learn how we support legal teams and claimants at every stage of the process.

Find a class action